Referred Articles
Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 68, October 2015, 1243-1294.
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 47, Issue S1, March/April 2015, 37-42.
Real Estate Economics, Vol. 43, Issue 1, Spring 2015, 241-270.
Public Finance Review, Vol. 44 Issue 1, December 2015, 6-21.
Housing Policy Debate, Volume 25, Issue 4, July 2015, 813-816.
National Institute Economic Review, No. 230, November 2014, 34-44.
Journal of Housing Economics, Vol. 24, June 2014, 4-20.
Journal of Real Estate Literature, Vol. 22 Issue 1, January 2014, 23-56.
Harvard Business Law Review, Vol. 3, Summer 2013, 83-118.
U.C. Davis Law Review, Vol. 46 Issue 4, April 2013, 1111-1173.
Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 50, No. 3, July 2013, 368-386
This paper provides the first estimates of housing price movements for Beijing in late pre-modern China. We hand-collect from archival sources transaction prices and other house attribute information from the 498 surviving house sale contracts for Beijing during the first two centuries of the Qing Dynasty (1644–1840), a long period without major wars, political turmoil, or significant institutional change in the Chinese capital. We use hedonic methods to construct a real estate price index for Beijing for the period. The regression analysis explains a major proportion of the variance of housing prices. We find that house prices grew steadily for the first half-century of the Qing Dynasty and declined afterwards in both nominal and real terms through the late eighteenth century. Nominal prices grew starting in the late eighteenth century and declined from the early nineteenth century through 1840. But these price changes occurred with contemporaneous price changes in basic measures of the cost of living: there was little change in real terms to the end of our period.